Not Vital
10 Paintings

The idea of Not Vital painting could admittedly sound a tad strange for those accustomed to his sculptural and architectural work, but even the most cursory glance at the history of contemporary art shows that practically every first-generation conceptual or performance artist began as a painter. The ten canvases in the exhibition at Galerie Urs Meile in Beijing are a testament, first and foremost, that Not Vital has always been a painter at heart. His formative years in Paris do not provide any significant insight into his first encounter with one of art’s most traditional and enduring forms. It was, after all, May 1968. A revolution of unparalleled socio-political relevance was in the making. There were institutional status quos to challenge and wars to take down. But Vital remembers a subsequent trip to
Rome as a more cathartic moment, with the pastel tones of the city inspiring a series of large canvases with very light chromatic variations. A sojourn in New York in 1974 furtherly produced a group of grey monochromes—a tonality he stills deploys to this day. (‘I am from Graubünden’, he jokingly concurs). His paintings in Beijing thirty-five years later, however, are an entirely different proposition. They are no longer the exercise of a young art student trying to find his own voice but a deliberate change of direction from an artist with an illustrious four-decade international career spent assembling pieces of epic proportions, and engaging with different cultural landscapes aided and abetted by a large array of collaborators. So how to reconcile this procedural approach with a solitary activity like painting?
‘Maybe that’s exactly what I wanted’ reflects Vital. ‘It was different. I really enjoyed being completely by myself, actually. Most of the times I worked with a sitting model, like Ai Weiwei, who was then my studio neighbour. And then my assistants or friends came by. It was very important to have a person in front of me. It was very quiet. No talk, no communication—just the essentials’.

This renewed sense of freedom—with the artist able to work in the spur of the moment and paint literally anyone who happened to be in front of him—was matched by the immediacy of the results. Used to the idea of working on long term projects that would require site-recognition, a
profound study of the setting, laborious planning, and weeks or months to develop, Vital was shocked to see how quickly something would materialize on the canvas once he started. The experience, apart from the initial charm, proved to be empowering, and brought him to continue with renewed alacrity. Usually completed in a single session—Vital confirms it was seldom that a painting wasn’t finished within the day—the canvases, when no one was available to get immortalized, turned to another classic mode of painting: self-portraiture. Three of the most successful examples (Self-Portrait, Self-Portrait on a Sunday, and Self-Portrait in a Snowstorm) are on view in this exhibition and stand out for their masterful use of the monochromatic scale.

One of Vital’s earliest efforts, the enigmatic Man (2010), is characterized by the presence of a full figure—a task almost unrepeated. With the exception of the beautiful Paloma (2012), in fact, most of the other works on view have the face of his subjects emerging as the darkest and more defined part
of a corporal structure that seems to gradually dissolve around them. Although Vital has declared each body to have an ‘aura’ and even acknowledged that his choice of colour and use of space make his
figures somehow ‘ghostly’, he accepts but refutes the notion that they are ‘spiritual’. His paintings, he says, are about the present, not the past—a logic that he swiftly applies even to those works which appear to contradict this stance, such as My Father (2013, arguably one of the most powerful pieces in the exhibition), or the recent Throwing Snowballs at Gogol (2019). The former, elaborates Vital, came about during the construction of a self-portrait, when he realized that the stylized signs he had adopted
to depict himself were actually reminiscent of his father. The latter, in contrast, carries a more mundane explanation, referencing the classics Vital started re-reading in Beijing to kill time. Ordinary episodes and self-deprecating argumentations notwithstanding, Vital’s ephemeral bodies are possibly the key factor that connects his paintings with the rest of his practice. Just like the figures he paints, the houses he built in Patagonia or in Engadin play a similar game of hide and seek.

But there is another aspect that links Vital’s paintings with his oeuvre, and that is his often- questioned decision to put them behind a glass partition. Given how artists like Jeff Koons or Damien Hirst have recognized and exploited the vitrine’s power to assign institutional value in the past, it is legitimate to wonder if Vital’s endgame is to use glass as a magnifying strategy. Or perhaps it is there because he doesn’t consider his paintings done until he puts something between him and them? ‘It’s a quite complex thing’ he agrees. ‘It’s about space. They invite you to the paintings, but they
also create the right distance to look at them. The glass generates a reflection and gives them light. We mostly observe our surroundings through glass, if you think about it. Even now I am looking at the landscape out of my house through a window. But if I think about painting in general’, he adds, almost provocatively, ‘I believe all paintings should be put behind a glass. Even Rembrandt’s.’

Just as Vital’s paintings are intrinsically interesting, so is their story. After spending about ten years between the artist’s studio and storage, these ten canvases now have the opportunity to be seen in public for the first time since their inception. ‘In the beginning I wasn’t sure if I should paint them,
let alone show them. Initially I thought of bringing them to Europe. But then I decided to show them where they were made and keep them there. Why should we ship all these works around the world? Why don’t we keep them where we made them?’ Beijing was their place of birth and it is now their final destination. By showing them in the Chinese capital, the same year he moved out of his local studio, 10 Paintings is finally on view as a testament of a very fertile creative period in the artist’s life and the fact
that things, for Not Vital, has really come full circle.

(Text by Michele Robecchi)

Not Vital is from the small mountain village of Sent, located in the Engadin valley (Switzerland). He studied art in Paris and Rome before moving to New York in 1976. Vital’s complex oeuvre in various media and widely varying materials—including marble, gold, stainless steel, plaster and wood—is
largely based upon biographical experiences and cultural sensitivity, often presenting a collision of the deeply personal and of political realities. He is an unconventional sculptor in many ways, not least because he also produces extraordinary prints, drawings, and (since 2009) portrait paintings. Since 2000, his practice has expanded to include buildings such as houses, schools, towers, bridges and tunnels, which blur the boundaries between art and architecture. His work was featured in “Plateau of Humanity” at the 49th Venice Biennale, Italy (2001) and in “Inhabiting the World” at the Busan Biennale, South Korea (2014). His major exhibitions have taken place at the Malmö Konsthall, Malmö, Sweden (1997-1998); the Kunsthalle Bielefeld, Germany (2005); The Arts Club of Chicago, Illinois, USA (2006); the
Kunsthalle Wien, Vienna, Austria (2009–2010); UCCA Center for  Contemporary Art, Beijing, China (2011); the Cabinet d’Arts Graphiques, Musées d’Art et d’Histoire, Geneva, Switzerland (2014); and the
Museo d’arte di Mendrisio, Mendrisio, Switzerland (2014–2015).